The Status and Residence of Elderly People in mid 19th-century Uttoxeter, by Shelley Robotham

From analysis of the census we know that there were 194 people aged 70+ living in Uttoxeter (87 men and 107 women) in 1851.  This equates to 4% of the total population of 4,815. Today the over-70s form 14% of the population of 13,467 – this demonstrates not only the increase in the proportion of elderly people but also the growth of the town as a whole from several phases of house building – in the Victorian age, throughout the 20th century and up to the current day.

Where and how did the mid 19th-century elderly people live?

Out of a total of 1,023 households in Uttoxeter, 154 included people over 70. More than half of the over-70s were living in their own homes and defined themselves as Head of Household (60 men and 49 women).  Many of these had a spouse and other family members living with them.    Only 15% of over-70s were living on their own.  Many elderly people were living with their families in households headed by other family members.   Twelve lived with households other than their families, as lodgers.  Two people were lodging house keepers themselves.

Ten people were living on income from house or land ownership; eighteen were receiving annuities or interest from investments.  There were five Chelsea pensioners.  From 1692 until 1955, all Army pensions were administered by and paid from the Royal Hospital Chelsea; hence all recipients, wherever they lived, were referred to as Chelsea Pensioners.

Eleven widows were living in the almshouses in Carter Street.  By this time the Uttoxeter Charities Committee had taken over the administration of the charities in the town.  Katherine Mastergent’s bequest from 1646 to house three widows of “honest and religious conversation” was amalgamated with John Wright’s bequest and a new almshouse was erected in Carter Street bearing their names. The Lathropp’s Almshouses were also rebuilt in 1849 on the opposite side of Carter Street to house four widows. 

Lathropp’s Almshouses, Carter Street, Uttoxeter

For the less fortunate there was always the Workhouse on the Heath.  Nine men and six women over 70 were living in the Workhouse, representing 12% of all Workhouse residents.

Some census respondents defined themselves by their occupation.  From the census it is impossible to tell whether they were still working or whether they were listing their earlier occupation.  Those like William Smith, the saddler who employed three men, or Thomas Alport, the shoemaker who employed two men, were presumably working in a supervisory capacity.  At a time when there was no state pension it was quite likely that those living in their own homes with no family support would have needed to keep working.  Two people over 80 described themselves as “servants” to the head of household.

As might be expected, most people fell into the 70–79 age group; there were 32 octogenarians (17 men, 15 women) and only four over the age of 90 – Samuel Chawner and Martha Barlow were 90, Elizabeth Roger and Mary Rotherham were both 92.

Sources

P M Turner, The Uttoxeter Charities 1594–1853 (Unpublished Study)

1851 census for Uttoxeter

http://citypopulation.de/en/uk/westmidlands/staffordshire/

https://www.chelsea-pensioners.co.uk/

Uttoxeter’s ‘Aftermath’ Charity (by Jim Preston)

“Apply to Charities Commission to transfer the following charity moneys to the Aftermath Charity.” This was my first encounter with the word ‘aftermath’ in the Uttoxeter Charities minute book. It seemed pretty clear to me that lots of little charities were being combined into one big one, and that the aftermath of those charities was called the Aftermath Charity.

But later I came across a sale advertisement in the Staffordshire Advertiser, “A piece of Meadowland, situate in the Netherwood… Copyhold of the Manor of Uttoxeter, and the Aftermath from the 8th August to the 24th of December belongs to the Trustees of Uttoxeter Charities.”

It turns out that the ‘math’ part of ‘aftermath’ comes from the Old English noun mæð, ‘a mowing’.  So ‘aftermath’ is grass growing in a meadow after the hay has been mown and removed. The Uttoxeter Charities had the right to that aftermath and it was common practice for charitable landowners to allow the poor to graze their aftermath. 

At some point it looks like the right had been commuted to selling the aftermath to the highest bidder and using the rent for relieve of the poor.  Each August, the Uttoxeter Charities trustees took the highest bids for the six lots of the Netherwood and the Town Meadow aftermath.

The amounts received seem to generally be in the £40-£50 range, as shown in the table below.

Year Aftermath Rental
1883 £31
1884 £40
1885 £47
1886 £49
1887 £69
1888 £31
1889 £46
1890 £44

Reports of a poor hay harvest in 1887 probably explain the high rent that year. For example, the Derby Mercury reported that “The stacks of hay and corn are both much below an average in bulk.”  High demand increased the price.

What about the dramatic decrease in 1888? Bid rigging? No, it looks as if the weather may be the cause. The Buxton Herald reported, “Bad weather prevails everywhere. We read of snow in London in July.” The harvest reports from the Derbyshire Advertiser show the weather had been good for grass: “Hay abundant”, “early hay spoiled, later a very big crop.” Presumably there was more than the usual rain, making the grass grow, meaning farmers had enough of their own grazing in 1888 and didn’t need to buy extra.

I don’t know about the low price in 1883. The Derbyshire Advertiser reported, “The hay crop was a good average one, and was got in good condition.”  Further investigation required.

I now know what aftermath is, how it was used for the poor, and have an idea about why its price fluctuated.

Sources:

Staffordshire Record Office D1194/2: Uttoxeter Charities Minute Book 1883-1950.

Staffordshire Advertiser, 22nd July 1882.

The Derby Mercury, 19th October 1887.

Buxton Herald, 18th July 1888.

Derbyshire Advertiser, 7th Sept 1888.

Derbyshire Advertiser, 21st Sept 1883.